Author Archives: Said E. Dawlabani

Featured Article: Economic Policy and Global Value Systems

August 2009 / Feature Articles

said dawlabaniIntroduction

The current global economic crisis has humbled the field of economics as a science for its systemic failure to foresee the global danger signs. Even the best and the brightest in President Obama’s elite and highly credentialed team of experts are quickly finding that the largest economic stimulus in history will not be enough to avert an economic disaster. There’s no question that the global economy remains in the eye of the storm awaiting a paradigm shift that will reset it on a course of sustainability and self renewal. No global challenge of this magnitude shall pass without a thorough examination of the thinking that pioneered the institutions that formulate economic policy. The purpose of this article is not to compete with prevailing schools of thought on the economy, but rather to provide an invitation to thought leaders to consider the study of global value systems as an integral part of future policy setting. This emerging science of value systems through developmental theories like Spiral Dynamics and the subsequent work of its co-author Dr. Don E. Beck give the objective observer the tools to identify the reasons for failed policies and the dynamics of the clash of cultural value systems leading to their failure. For many years I have worked with Dr. Beck who is a senior advisor for the Center for Human Emergence Mideast and have used Spiral Dynamics and the principles of Natural Design extensively in my business practices. For a detailed description of Spiral Dynamics, Natural Design, their history and field applications you can visit the CHE-Mideast website on the following link:

The History of the Current Economic Development Models and What’s Missing

We have all heard the expression “to the victor belong the spoils”. Well, to the victors of WWII belonged the greatest spoils modern humanity had ever experienced; the undisputed mandate to set up a single economic model for the world to insure that human potential is put into productive peaceful pursuits. It was an Anglo-Saxon victory like no other before it. Thus, the world was divided into 3 camps; the capitalists, the communists and the third world. Based on the ideals of the British father of capitalism, Adam Smith, it was strongly believed that a developed world where private ownership of resources with the least amount of regulation and the pursuit of free market ideals will surely make our planet a better and safer place. Europe and Japan were quickly rebuilt with economies based on what England and the US thought were best suited for their own cultural value systems. Communism was left to its own devices as the model and its effect on societal emergence had not been fully vetted. To attract less developed countries into the capitalist camp and away from communism, England and the US created the charter for institutions like the IMF and the World Bank through the Breton Woods System of Monetary Management to help poor and emerging countries finance this Utopian but arduous journey.

More than sixty years into this experiment and the results are a mixed bag. On one end of the spectrum the free market economy concept worked well for nations that were already developed and had the institutional capacities in place to make the transition to highly industrialized consumer-based economies. The ideals of communism proved detrimental to innovation and human advancement as the world associated central planning and ownership of resources by governments as primary causes of inefficiency and the stifling of individual and institutional relevance. Communist countries under the Soviet umbrella experienced a noticeable downshift in their standard of living, which from a cultural development perspective should have caused the system to either break or cause noticeable social dissonance as it forced human emergence back in time. It is worth noting that although communism contributed to many social ills and widespread poverty in Eastern Europe, the region never descended to anarchy or civil war, which symbolize the modern struggles of tribal and third world cultures. The belief in the institutions of the state and their ability to reject false Memes through the existing system was an imbedded belief in the fabric of the Eastern Europe culture. Now that the communist ideals proved unsustainable, formerly communist nations have commenced their cultural emergence from where they left off and find institutions like the IMF and the World Bank ready to help in reviving their human and industrial capacities.

At the other end of the spectrum however, the story is quite different. In the absence of intuitions that have defined cultures for centuries, the less developed world has gotten further behind and is struggling to feed millions of its own people. So, what went wrong? How did the brightest Western minds with hundreds of years of quantifiable scientific measures fail to anticipate the challenges facing the Third World? The answers lie in the developed world’s inability to identify barriers to development from a cultural values perspective.

How Current Economic Policies Deny Evolution of Cultural Value Systems

At the end of the colonial era imperial powers carved up tribal lands into arbitrary countries with the hope that tribes will be forced to dismiss thousands of years of rivalries for a cause called “Nation”. The promise of industrial prosperity was the carrot at the end of the stick. It is a concept that worked so well for Europe and Japan, but has remained foreign to most places in Africa, the Middle East and many poor places till this day. What the framers of the Breton Woods architecture ignored was that places that are primarily tribal in nature must build their own indigenous capacities that would eventually transcend tribal existence and propel them into their own unique expression of cultural prosperity. The US, Europe (East and West), Russia, Japan and China have been at this level of social development within their own cultures for centuries. In the case of third world nations which have remained a loose band of tribes, only indigenous tribal leaders can find and identify these capacities and the West can help only in the development of what was identified. This calls for a substantial shift from the current UN model which sends its own experts whose thinking is steeped in the egalitarian value system and super-impose a Western model.

In Beck’s developmental theory, before a tribe can embrace industrial age values, it has to go through an egocentric stage where an individual’s values are imposed over those that make up the collective values of the tribe. Europe went through this evolution over hundreds of years and the results were many bloody wars. The US went through it during the war of independence and the civil war at a cost of millions of lives to get to a stage to say “never again”. The conquest of this egocentric stage should never be underestimated or it will manifest in pathologies that create organizations like Al-Qaeda and the endless number of failed states. The phenomenon of failed states has become more common because the Anglo-Saxon model of development cannot be substituted for an indigenously designed model that first and foremost takes into account the developmental stages that a country is in. Instead of recognizing the natural evolutionary stages of social emergence and designing to accommodate for the next stage, the Anglo-Saxon model imposed a one-solution-fits-all answer designed in the ivory towers of academia and Western think tanks. This rush to move the third world to a world of enterprise without systemic awareness to its consequences caused the rise of power lords to leadership positions who in turn exploited their countries’ resources and oppressed their own people in efforts to protect their power thus halting the natural emergence to the next stage.

Seeing the (Indigenous) Trees Before the (Anglo-Saxon) Forest

What policy makers should have been aware of is that this egocentric stage of social development wouldn’t need to take on the form of bloody warfare. According to the Spiral Dynamics theory and Beck’s own work in South Africa and the West Bank, each cultural value system has a healthy and an unhealthy expression. The unhealthy expression in tribal transition is warfare and the rise of the power lords. The healthy expression, which should be the focus of the UN, is designing for economic prosperity at the tribal level which will blunt any unhealthy desires to start wars with the neighboring tribes. This type of policy setting would have required intimate knowledge of the indigenous life conditions of those tribes and the challenges they face. Based on information gathered from these places, a better informed UN can create the basis for what I call “Stratified Economic Policy”. The concept of micro loans created by Muhammad Yunus is a great example of such highly functional solutions for Bangladesh and places of similar indigenous challenges. Indigenous sustainability in the mind of the locals and in accordance with their relative standards of living ought to be the ultimate goal of any stratified economic policy. The imposition of anything of higher complexity will result in exploitation by the few like the case is often with most currently UN sponsored programs.

To bring this down to the individual level, one should start by asking (through a local indigenous leader, and never through a Western aid worker) these questions: What will make you happy? What kind of work can you do or hope to learn to help you become happy? All economic policy would focus on then is teaching individuals and cultures the skills to become well adjusted into their relative value system and not that of the West. The key to human emergence is to acknowledge where people and cultures are on the value-systems scale and make sure that much of the resources and efforts are focused on making the expression of that value system healthy. Contrary to much of the prevailing Western thought, it is not that we don’t give people in poor places enough food to eat, it’s that we don’t teach them how to create the habitats based on their own life conditions to create their own indigenous prosperity.

Without the interference of Western designed development programs, the third world would have very likely developed along these lines: In order to move to more advanced developmental stages, capital accumulation earned from hard work within a tribe’s indigenously healthy value system must be applied towards what evolves next and naturally for that tribe. To some it could be acquisition of farm land. To others it could mean sending their first born to a good school, or buying more cattle like the case is with most Central African tribes. Tribal life might be centered on these healthy value systems for centuries before a natural transition takes place to the next stage of emergence that required the building of national institutions on which the entrepreneurial Meme is built. These normal transitions to healthy manifestations of a culture’s uniqueness were halted by the appearances of two phenomena that were the byproducts of the Anglo-Saxon model for development: The West’s insatiable appetite for natural resources and the creation of the IMF.

Into a Tribal World Enter OPEC

After WWII the industrialized world shifted its focus to a consumer-based industrial economy, which required a tremendous amount of resources and raw material. And lo and behold, as if the Gods were testing the West’s true intentions in claiming to help the rest of humanity, most of these raw material were found in third world countries; OPEC for oil and Africa and South America for the rest of the raw material needed for modern day consumption. From Beck’s macro development theory perspective, these non-industrialized countries had never experienced a systemic enforcement of the rule of law at a national level nor had the resources or the complexity to understand the meaning of most of the institutions that the West takes for granted. In describing the reason for the arrested development stage of these countries, a renowned social scientist specializing in South and Central America said these arbitrary nations never had the chance to rebel. The discovery of natural resources in tribal cultures had, in essence, halted the normal stages of human development within them. Left to their own devices, without having the West extracting their natural resources from the ground, these cultures would have maintained a natural evolutionary process and formed healthier and more cooperative tribes tested and tried by the passage of time to smooth out tribal differences before the idea of “Nation” could crystallize. Life conditions at the time of discovery of oil were such that egocentric warriors had to rise to leadership positions without ever being exposed to concepts such as nationalism, the importance of state institutions, and a real understanding of wealth management. To protect their new-found “lute”, these leaders used tribal warfare tactics in making sure their own tribe prevails. Till this day, if you’re a developer wishing to get a Billion dollar project approved in Saudi Arabia, or Dubai, a poem written just for the occasion that praises the generosity and the greatness of the Sheikh, will improved your odds of success tremendously over someone who’s done extensive research about the market viability of the project and its associated costs.

The cultural pathologies caused by OPEC in a place like Venezuela have taken on a slightly different twist. Populist economic policy has been the tool of choice for tribal leaders in South America. While Western media shows Chavez as a rebel paying lip service to the poor and giving them small siphons for food and sidelining most national institutions, they fail to mention that the rate of poverty in Venezuela has been cut in half since he came to power. This is no endorsement of Chavez who’s known to have stolen billions in oil revenues and set Venezuela back a few years on its road to progress. It is, however, an indictment of third world economies that followed the Anglo-Saxon model for development without giving much attention to their own country’s Memetic contours. While the entrepreneurial Meme flourished in Caracas and other small pockets, the majority of Venezuela remained in the tribal agricultural Meme just as it has been for centuries. According to Beck’s theory, the rise of Chavez to power is a natural response to prevalent life conditions as they counteract the unnatural pull created in “skipping” a developmental stage.

Into a World of Poverty and Power Lords Enter the IMF

The story with the IMF is slightly different in the sense that it catered to the same pathologies of exploitation through loans instead of oil revenue. Without ever knowing what Africa needs like Dr. Yunus knew what Bangladesh needs, the IMF, by ignoring the role that cultural values play in the development of a culture, is responsible for more death and corruption than any other post WWII institution. One only needs to look at which countries borrow from the IMF. Over 97% of debtor countries prior to the current global financial crisis were ruled by dictators with the blood of thousands of their countrymen on their hands. Rulers like Mugabe and Assad (the father) are on the top of the list. In the absence of a ruthless dictator who would squander most IMF loans and force member countries to renegotiate the debt, the IMF would declare the misuse of funds by a weak leader and send in World Bank experts who would force the “privatization” of things like power plants. Such moves ignored the life conditions that required the public ownership of such symbols of progress. These were cultures in transition from tribal existence to early stages of nation formation. When the resources and institutions that are intended to help in that transition are snatched from a development program and given to private power lords, or Western conglomerates represented by local power lords, social and cultural development to the next stage (or to a healthy manifestation of the current stage) is halted.

A full discussion of IMF policies would require many volumes to expose its shortcomings. Parts of the institution’s initial charter is slowly becoming more aligned with its practices, not because of profound changes in its policies toward the developing world, but because the value systems of countries that now need its services (Iceland and Poland are good examples) are more aligned with the value systems of the thinking that created it. As for their dealings with the Third World, their thinking has fallen further behind as they refuse to heed the indigenous needs of these countries. For many Third World counties that continue to struggle to make interest payments on their loans, the IMF is now advocating bankruptcy, a Western tool of mass destruction that will perpetuate the Third World’s dependence on the industrialized world and drive them further away from establishing any indigenous capacities. Meanwhile, IMF and World Bank economists are patting themselves on the back for continuing to perpetuate a culture of debt in their own world and thumbing their noses at a collapsing world economy brought to its knees by the same policies of debt financing they’re now advocating for Third World countries.

The road to this Utopian dream that was hatched by Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill in Breton Woods, NH has turned out to be the road to Perdition for third world countries rich and poor. If the Group of the 20 richest countries in the world wants to seriously address the causes of poverty and the stalled development of so many regions in the world they first and foremost have to acknowledge the failures of their models for third world development. At the G-20 meeting this past spring, instead of holding a healthy debate about the dangers of what happens when global institutions ignore the need for functional indigenous solutions, world leaders instead voted to triple the resources of the IMF without implementing meaningful change. Renegotiated Third World debt with higher principal balances is precisely the invitation that the industrialized world needs to fully own the natural resources of these counties and, without developing the habitats for emergence, it will be just a matter of time before they default again.

On the other hand, much of the “Nouveau Riche” countries whose wealth was created by the sudden discovery of natural resources will have to transition from “wealthy tribal cultures” that ignore the needs of the many to “nations with sustainable wealth and faith in institutions” that include the many or face a fate similar to that of Venezuela. The earliest culture to overthrow the Anglo-Saxon model for development was Iran. The power lords that were brought in with the fall of the Shah have created “false institutions” that are now threatening the world with nuclear weapons and after 30 years still consider the West to be Satan. Making Iran, Venezuela and other potential OPEC nations such pariahs could have been prevented if the West had the tools to identify these countries’ unique value systems and the needs for cultural emergence.

The flood of unconditional oil revenues from industrialized countries and loans with little accountability from the IMF have corrupted tribal values forever and created a pathology that has become very difficult to undo. When oil revenues disappear, most OPEC countries will have to wake up and realize that to prevent future abuse of power and to cater to the welfare of all the citizens in their country, it’s not enough to choose a good tribal leader to lead. Rather, it becomes paramount to establish societal institutions and the rule of law as the absolute base for sustainability and self reliance. To Europe, the US and Japan, this came after hundreds of years of bloody warfare. To the third world, it would have to come from a perspective of “Stratified Economic Policies” that build capacities commensurate with and informed by the indigenous life conditions on the ground and not by some Western think tank with Ivy League credentials relying on a CIA country profile or an out of touch UN with a dossier of IMF and World Bank reports claiming to know what ails a world of lower complexity.

^––––––– ^

Said E. Dawlabani is President and Founding Partner of EcoVest Advisors, LLC., a real estate development and investment consultancy. His blog Sustainability’s New Frontier details where “economics meet Memetics.” He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Center for Human Emergence Middle East, a think tank that examines the Memetic patterns of emergence in the Middle East. He can be reached

Notes from the Field: Natural Design Solutions for Indigenous Cultures ~ The Next Frontier in Geo-Political Strategy

June 2008 / Notes from the Field

“The FBI will be celebrating its 100th anniversary this year and I would have to say that the interview with Saddam Hussein is one of the top accomplishments in our agency’s history.” ~
FBI Assistant Director Joe Persichini

Dalawi 1This statement was made to the CBS news program 60 minutes about the work of one George Piro, a young FBI agent who had Saddam in a few short months after his capture divulging the secrets of his rein of terror. From the fate of his WMD’s to the gassing of thousands of Kurds, these were the type of secrets that most sophisticated intelligence agencies around the world couldn’t get their hands on in over 30 years. How did the FBI do it? Agent Piro is a native of the Middle East who understood the importance of every cultural nuance that, more often than not, does not register in Western minds or on their radar screens. The simple act of allowing Saddam to write and recite poetry, the pretence of showing him the respect he once commanded, and the simplest of acts of bringing him home cooked Lebanese food made by Piro’s mother were among the top weapons used by the FBI to extract the deepest secrets from the man posing the greatest danger to world security.

This is a simplistic but real example of how understanding culture can contribute to the success of anything we do in the Middle East from questioning a terror suspect to achieving a significantly higher rate of success in international diplomacy. Uncovering the cultural codes that are deeply imbedded in the collective mind of the Middle East is the next frontier that must be understood by the West and encouraged to emerge in order for the region to turn away from destruction and contribute positively to sustainable development. This vision is the motivating force behind the work of the Center for Human Emergence Middle East in Palestine.

In 2005, acting on an invitation from the region, geo-political expert Dr. Don Beck, Founder of the Global Center for Human Emergence along with Elza Maalouf, The Arab-American CEO of the CHE-Mideast, made their first exploratory visit to the region. Most observers were expecting their findings to be of little or no variation from a surface assessment of the victim and the aggressor, and of us vs. them. Instead their focus turned to understanding the codes that lie beneath the surface that were preventing true peace and stability from taking hold. This platform from which they launched their ambitious framework is the brainchild of Dr. Beck who co-authored the theory of Spiral Dynamics that has been transforming the way we see culture for over 30 years. From South Africa’s transition from apartheid to recent governmental reforms in the Netherlands, Spiral Dynamics integral (SDi) and Natural Design are becoming the tools of choice for transcending political stalemates, moving from partisan bickering to “Transpartisan” solutions that carry a third win, to designing a modern nation empowered by the unique resources of its indigenous culture.

Once the predominant SDi developmental levels of a culture are identified, designing solutions that fit the needs of that culture becomes of paramount importance. This is where Western-designed solutions cease to exist and indigenous designs start to emerge. In its simplest form Natural Design asks the following question: HOW does WHO lead/manage/teach WHOM to do WHAT and WHERE.

Armed with this conceptual framework, the social scientist and the cultural translator together became a deadly weapon that pierced through the thick wall that was perpetuating the status quo. Like true scientists committed to the integrity of their research, Beck and Maalouf knew the importance of non-traditional sources of data and used it in combination with the official by-lines of government, readily available data from NGO’s and the Palestinian record of vital statistics. Through their extensive research and continuous interaction with Palestinians across all demographics, it became apparent to them that a huge asymmetry exists between Israeli and Palestinian cultures and this was the main cause of breakdown in any negotiations. While Israel was a first world culture that enforced the rule of law and promoted technological advancement, (BLUE and ORANGE), Palestine has remained—for many reasons—underdeveloped with non-functioning institutions and feudal power lords running the affairs of its people (PURPLE-RED with some Blue-Orange in education and business). The focus then shifted from the hugely perceived inter-conflict between Israel and Palestine to the intra-conflict among Palestinians to identify the internal forces that were keeping the culture and its people behind. Beck and Maalouf then embarked on a far-reaching program designed to build up the capacities within Palestine that will eventually level the asymmetry between Israel and an emerging Palestinian state. It became known as the “Build Palestine Initiative.”(BPI)

At the beginning few people understood the goals of the BPI. It wasn’t offering handouts like many NGO’s were. Instead it was insisting that Palestinians start building their own capacities and take responsibility for building institutions designed with input from their own people, instead of using Western models fashioned by think tanks anxious to claim credit for resolving a conflict of historic proportions. The biggest challenge for the CHE-Mideast was to find systemic thinkers who believed in such pioneering and evolutionary thinking: the George Piros of Palestine who needed to be fully aware of what the goals of the conceptual framework were and more importantly how to relay them to the people in a cultural context that causes them to act in their own national interest and slowly move away from the victimized dependence on others. This had to be a Palestinian effort designed by informed Palestinians who have a wider vision and a deeper understanding of the codes of developing societies. It was the CHE Mideast’s job to find and equip these individuals with the understanding of WHY such large scale thinking needed to emerge.

The Anatomy of Natural Design in Palestine

As the word about the BPI spread it attracted the attention of younger leaders all over the West Bank, especially the Third and Fourth Generation leaders of the Fatah Movement. These Fatah leaders, who spent more time with books than with guns, were searching for innovative ways to reclaim power after their party’s resounding defeat to Hamas and Hamas’ subsequent and violent takeover of Gaza. Moreover they wanted to find ways to communicate a vision of a new Fatah to the powerful Revolutionary Guard, and the President’s inner circle. The entire party had come to the inevitable realization that corruption, lack of transparency, and denying people the most basic of services were the leading causes of their demise.

Nafiz al-Rifaei and Adbul Majid Suwaiti were thought leaders among the Third Generation who quickly understood and embraced the SDi and Natural Design methodologies. The respect these men commanded among the younger Fatah generation and Palestinians from all walks of life throughout the West Bank was the assurance that Beck and Maalouf needed to proceed with this grass-roots movement. With that assurance in hand Beck and Maalouf went about to design their large-scale framework that will become the foundation for a nation-building movement.

Create a Super-Ordinate Goal.

Sensing the desperate need for a new perspective, the CHE-Mideast team proceeded to design an overarching vision that will make Palestine the “Dubai of the Levant” by painting a positive picture of what a developed Palestine would look like, i.e. transportation systems, new economic policies, job creation, healthcare systems, educational systems etc…These activities will leap frog what has happened in Gaza with a much more substantial cultural development program. Such a program will demonstrate how the approach for the emerging leadership is more powerful, positive, and obtainable than what others produce. Imbedded in the design framework was this super-ordinate goal.

Establish a Code of Ethics.

All emerging leaders are to sign a Statement of Independence declaring transparency in all their dealings and issuing annual financial statements that will help in combating corruption.

Hold a Full-Court Press on “NEW VISION”

Under the guidance of the CHE Mideast, Rifaie and Suwaiti moved quickly to open up dialogue with individuals, community leaders, and other such population groupings in every village, city, town and neighborhood throughout the West Bank. This was done after Beck and Maalouf trained hundreds of these men and women in SDi and Natural Design to become well versed in the language of cultural systems. Thus being able to assess their own value-systems as well as the groups’ value-systems they are appealing to. This helped the movement in meeting the people where they are and engage them in the NEW VISION of a successful Palestine.

Establish a Palestinian Think Tank.

A 50-member Palestinian think tank made up of academicians, business and civic leaders from all political parties across Palestine who will be well versed in the CHE methodologies is in the process of being formed. It is crucial for this group to be open to new models of development that transcend religion, ethnicity, political preference and other categories that result in stereotypes, stigmas, and polarization. This think tank will also introduce the processes for dealing with conflict, extremism, and other disruptive forces in the group all the time keeping its sights on the superordinate goal.

Develop Vital Signs Monitors (VSM) and Other Assessments Tools.

This cultural mapping approach is based on Dr. Beck’s theory and pioneered by his partners, the Arlington Institute, and in Singapore sponsored by the government of Singapore. This technology will be designed specifically for the West Bank and Gaza to track the critical indicators in the culture and will document and quantify—with Global Information Systems (GIS) technology—the patterns of development, economic well being, crime, social projects and many other vital statistics that are deemed of importance to Palestinian society. Consider an operations-type room with floor to ceiling video screens where the critical indicators are displayed and overlaid on top of each other. Such a monitor can search for the deepest trends, major value-systems conflicts in the making, serious sink-holes in development projects, and the general health and well-being of the culture. In June 2007 Beck and Maalouf met with Palestine’s Planning Minister, Prof. Sameer Abu Eisheh, and covered the use of GIS systems already being used by the Ministry and how it could be applied to support the new technology of VSM. Ideally, this mapping approach will be located at one of the Palestinian Universities.

Create a Center for Integral Strategy.

This will be a clearing house for all of the more than 3,200 NGOs currently licensed in Palestine so that Palestinian leadership can take control of these activities, rather than simply accept what is given. This will happen by developing the insight to know how to integrate, align, and synergize all of these efforts, thus creating critical mass. This is how more can be done more quickly to win over the hearts and minds of Palestinians. Otherwise, efforts are piecemeal, competitive, ad-hoc, and fragmented. Further, some of the good efforts are contrary to the needs of the Palestinian people, or to their respective levels of development.

Culmination of 3 ½ Years of Work

On February 2, 2008 over 3 years of work at the grass roots level all came together in a Nation-Building Convention at the Shepherd Hotel in Bethlehem. The Build Palestine Initiative had become an unstoppable movement that’s giving justified hope and pride to all who came in touch with it. In the words of one Palestinian leader “this event was an earthquake that shook the ground in Palestine. We must now deal with the crucial after shocks that will propel the Palestinian people towards true Nationhood.” Over 700 community and political leaders came from Jericho, Qalqyliah, Tulkarm, Hebron, Ramallah, Nablus, Silfit, and Jerusalem, spending long hours at checkpoints throughout the West Bank to be part of something historic that they named “Palestine 21”. The speeches focused on addressing political, social and economic injustices brought about by the dysfunction and inefficiencies inherent in their own culture and government. All recommendations that were given took into account the framework that was laid out by Dr. Beck and Ms. Maalouf.

In his speech entitled “Ana Falistini” (I am Palestinian) that is circulating on YouTube, Dr. Beck said “For the political Road Map involving Israel and Palestine to be successful, thePalestinian Development Map must first be implemented…”

In his speech Nafiz Rifaie reminded participants “Our image around the world is ugly. They say he’s Palestinian then he must be a terrorist ready to blow himself up. We must get rid of that image. This Palestinian will participate in world emergence, dreams of freedom, and is ready to lead his society into excellence…To liberate Palestine is To build Palestine.”

Elza Maalouf emphasized the critical role that the CHE-Mideast is playing in the region saying, “ The mission of the Center for Human Emergence-Middle East is to enable transformation and emergence in our Arab reality. Our goal is to support Arab thought leaders and innovators who are activating new ways of thinking and doing, opening up the space for new possibilities for themselves, their communities, their countries and the region as a whole.”

A book containing the recommendation of participants is now being published and will be presented to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, President Perez, President George W. Bush, Special Envoy to the Middle East Tony Blair, and the United Nations.

Future Activities

The CHE Mideast will continue to lead this movement and give it the indigenous character that it must have. As we await new sources of funding our work is reaching a critical tipping point. Our Palestinian partners in the newly formed CHE Palestine have asked us to help train as many as 200,000 people in the SDi and Natural Design methodologies. Once funding is available the final selections to the Palestinian think tank will be made and an intensive training of its members by Dr. Beck and Ms. Maalouf will take place. In addition, we’re in the process of developing our own assessments that will form the basis on which much of our Vital Signs Monitors technology will rely.

As the political situation on the ground changes day by day, we remain eternally optimistic about a technology that uncovers in every human the undeniable birthright of self-reliance.

Spiral Dynamics integral concerns itselfwith eight identified stages of social development. Here’s a brief overview:

The Eight Stages of Social Development:

Spiral Dynamics Integral, or SDi for short, concerns itself with the deep complexity codes that shape our many worlds. The model describes and makes sense of the enormous complexity of human existence, and then shows how to craft elegant, systemic solutions that meet people and address situations where they are. SDi identified eight levels of social development and the colors associated with these stages for the ease of use:

Level 1- Beige: Survival Sense, Staying Alive. Lives in bands and clans. Biological impulses and memories.

Level 2- Purple: Tribal Order. Safety and Security-Driven. The customary ways of the ancestors are interpreted by elders and chieftains so as to define specific roles and kinship relations.

Level 3- Red: Power-Driven. Exploitative Empire. Leaders have the most power because they are stronger and tougher.

Level 4- Blue: Authoritarian Structure. Order-Driven. Seniority and right position in the formal structure determines who leads whom.

Level 5- Orange: Strategic Enterprise. Achievement-Driven. Those who can demonstrate success set the standard to beat and give out incentives for improvement to the winners.

Level 6- Green: Social Network. People-Driven. Egalitarian. All must share equally in leadership and building consensus since no individual is better than other.

Level 7- Yellow: Systemic Flow. Process-Oriented. The work to be done leads the most competent person(s) to guide tasks and functions through use of appropriate intelligences. There is little fear and no status, power, image or emotional traps.

Level 8- Turquoise: Holistic. Everything Connects. Global reach. Lives responsible to sustain all life. Experience the wholeness of existence through mind and spirit.

Said E. Dawlabani is Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Center for Human Emergence Middle East. A real estate developer turned social entrepreneur. He has a prominent 25-year career in the brokerage, development and investment counseling sectors of the real estate industry in Boston, Scottsdale, and San Diego. In recent years he’s been applying his vision to build sustainable capacities in people as well as sustainable habitats. He studied the Integral approach to solving world problems for years and has been an advocate of Dr. Don Beck’s work world wide and in the Middle East, specifically, as he sees his theoretical framework as the only comprehensive approach that will bring lasting peace and prosperity to the region. To reach Mr. Dawlabani or for additional information about the CHE-Mideast’s work go to