John Jacob Zucker Gardiner

Paper presented at the first Working Collaboratively for Sustainability
International Conference, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington, April 12, 2009.

 

Global sustainability – social, economic, and environmental—is best served by an emergent leadership metaphor that serves the triple bottom lines of profits, people, and planet of the 21st century global corporation: transcendent leadership. Introduced as a global imperative at the 2007 World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland (Useem, 2007, pp. 1-2), transcendent leadership had been the subject of earlier research by Seattle University professor John Jacob Zucker Gardiner (Leadership Review, spring 2006, pp. 62-76).

Robert K. Greenleaf’s metaphor of servant leader had inspired the transcendent leadership model (1977). Greenleaf noted that “to be a lone chief atop a pyramid is abnormal and corrupting. None of us is perfect by ourselves, and all need the correcting influence of close colleagues” (p. 63). Regarding board leadership, Greenleaf added: “the mere presence of trustees in the absence of the performance which their place and title implies, does not generate  trust – enough trust to give our society the stability it needs” (pp.10-11).

Transcendent leadership, grounded in servant leadership, offers a pathway to increased trust necessary for global sustainability. Transcendent leadership offers a more inclusive and consensual decision making process for the economic, social, and environmental sectors, moving beyond a singular focus on the bottom line of profits to a multiple focus on the triple bottom lines of profits, people, and planet.

“The metaphor of transcendent leadership moves us away from the tired language of our transactional/ transformational reality into a reality worthy of a united planet, a planet of one humanity, moving from interdependence to wholeness. The metaphor of transcendent leadership, deeply aligned with the central criteria of shared governance, offers us a language to help us transcend current governance crises of Enron, the United States, and our home planet. The complex problems of our world today will not be resolved by the consciousness that created them. Transcendent leadership offers us a metaphor to help us move more closely to a world where human talents and energies will be maximized for the betterment of all-personally, organizationally, globally. (Gardiner, 2006, p. 72)”

The prevailing model of governance that sets the chief executive officer apart from the rest of the organization gives way to a more collaborative decision making process by an emergent leadership circle.For the sake of equity and justice in economic, social, and environmental sectors, the time has come to challenge the prevailing model of autocratic leadership. Working collaboratively for sustainability requires the values and vision of transcendent leadership.

From leader to leadership

In Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership (Bass, 1990, p. 11), the section on the meaning of leadership begins with the following words:

“Although the Oxford English Dictionary (1933) noted the appearance of the word ‘leader’ in the English language as early as the year 1300, the word ‘leadership’ did not appear until the first half of the nineteenth century…and that word did not appear in most other modern languages until recent times.”

Zacko-Smith traces the evolutionary nature of leadership in a recent Leadership Review article (summer 2007, pp. 75-88). Most significantly, early definitions of leadership emphasized its communal nature…its focus on a group accomplishing common purpose…on shared leadership. At a lunch during the 2008 International Leadership Association (ILA) global conference, Cynthia Cherrey, longtime ILA president, said to me that many countries still have no word for leadership—and many countries that do simply define it as something the leader does.  It is time to move from a global consciousness of the leader as autocrat to one of leadership with its communal emphasis on the accomplishment of shared purpose, on shared governance. It is time to move the consciousness of the world’s people from that of leader to that of leadership. Transcendent leadership offers a metaphor to help encourage that shift of consciousness.

Shared governance and transcendent leadership

Shared governance is an essential component of transcendent leadership affecting equity and justice in growing sustainability within all sectors of decision making: economic, social, and environmental. The six characteristics of shared governance (a climate of trust; information sharing; meaningful participation; collective decision making; protecting divergent views; and redefining roles) allow for development of metrics to measure progress in movement toward interdependence and wholeness (Gardiner, 2006, pp. 65-66).

Transcendent leaders look beyond categories to find wholeness in division, to find the commonality that connects us all.

“In his commencement address to the centennial graduation class at Stanford University, John W. Gardner said, ‘Your goal is not to achieve wholeness by suppressing diversity, nor to make wholeness impossible by enthroning diversity, but to preserve both. Each element in the diversity must be respected, but each must ask itself sincerely what it can contribute to the whole. I don’t think it venturing beyond the truth to say that ‘wholeness incorporating diversity’ defines the transcendent task of our generation.” (Kouzes and Posner, 1993, pp. 124-125)

The danger that lies inherent in transcendent leadership is its potential to allow individual and group stories of oppression to be made less valuable, less accountable to the historical oppression linked to privilege. Equity among people should be addressed today so that the pathway to transcendence is an ethical and moral one and not one used to cover up historical oppression. Transcendence must not be allowed to drown out the voices of oppressed people (Gardiner, 2008, p. 5).

Grounded in a consciousness of wholeness, transcendent leadership offers a revolutionary frame for viewing human interaction in organizational settings. Going beyond transactional and transformational leadership with their bottom lines of profits and people, it introduces the third bottom line of planet, moving the core emphasis from inter-dependence to wholeness. It is the ability to lead from a consciousness of wholeness that most distinguishes transcendent leadership. That same consciousness of wholeness is also at the heart of effective global sustainability.

Nonprofit organizations: Seedbeds for global sustainability

In an interview, the week before his 90th birthday, Peter F. Drucker said the following to Andrew Pollack of The New York Times (November 14, 1999, p. B2):

“The unique 20th-century creation, the corporation, is not going to survive in the 21st century…the knowledge workers of today will save their best efforts for nonprofit social service organizations, where they can make a bigger difference…the next century is going to be the century of the social sector.”

While these thoughts of Peter Drucker seemed radical ten years ago, in the context of severe global economic distress, our economic assumptions are being challenged, our assumptions of autocratic CEOs with personal friends as trustees now seem wrong, and Drucker’s prophecy appears to be more possible and more likely on a day to day basis. Indeed, nonprofit groups are increasingly becoming the rich seedbeds for global sustainability … particularly, as they work closely together with their sponsoring for-profit corporations to help renew the vision and mission of their corporate communities in the context of an ever more interconnected planet.

Global sustainability

Global sustainability most simply is about maintaining a state or balance in which the Earth’s resources are used at a rate at which they can be replenished and renewed. Unfortunately, according to almost all scientific assessments, humanity is not living within that balance rather it is using natural resources at unsustainable levels and polluting Earth at increasingly high levels of toxicity. Humanity is living unsustainably and a global effort is needed to return use of natural resources and levels of pollution to more balanced, ecological levels.

At a global level, eight key sustainability goals were identified by Hak and others (2007, p. 156).

• Intergenerational equity for future generations;
• Decoupling economic growth from environmental degradation;
• Integration of environmental, social, and economics pillars;
• Ensuring environmental adaptability and resilience;
• Preventing irreversible long-term damage to ecosystems and human health;
• Ensuring distributional equity by avoiding unfair costs on vulnerable populations;
• Accepting global responsibility for effects outside areas of jurisdiction; and
• Education and grassroots involvement to solve problems and develop new solutions.

These eight goals should be considered by leaders and organizations that want to align their mission with global sustainability, that want to serve as transcendent leaders aligning their service with a consciousness of wholeness, with the triple bottom lines of profits, people, and planet.

The evolution of our thinking about global sustainability requires our challenging the assumptions of human enterprise beginning with our conventional thinking about leadership and organizations. Who are the exemplars of leadership that emerge from a consciousness of wholeness? What practices and values do they bring to their organizations? What practices and values do they bring to the emergent theory of transcendent leadership? How do they lend support to the goals of global sustainability?

Transcendent leadership and global sustainability: Exemplars and their core values

In early development of the theory and practice of an emergent metaphor of transcendent leadership, Gardiner and Walker (2009) identified and explored the lives of many early exemplars including Mother Teresa, Albert Einstein, Oprah Winfrey, John Henry Stanford, Anwar Sadat, Pope John XXIII, The Dalai Lama, John W. Gardner, Peace Pilgrim (Mildred Norman), Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, and, most especially, Mohandas K. Gandhi. Core values that emerged for them all included love and healing, integrity and courage, humility and wisdom, truth and peace. Their stories will  not be repeated here rather other transcendent corporate leaders  will be considered along with their impact on global sustainability and  on  the emergent theory and practice of transcendent leadership. Each of their values, strengths, limitations, and possibilities as transcendent leaders will be considered in the context of global sustainability.

• Bono (Paul David Hewson), Lead Vocalist, U2Co. Founder, DATA, EDUN, ONE Campaign, Product Red;
• Dikembe Mutombo, NBA Defensive Star, Houston Rockets. Founder, Mutombo Hospital and Research Center, Congo;
• Paul Newman, Superstar Actor & Founder, Newman’s Own

Forms of transcendent leadership that inspire us today include the rock star and/ or super athlete and/ or famous actor that lend their name, their visibility, their fame to significant nonprofit causes greater than themselves. These individuals prove to us that human goodness and self transcendence are found among our species in people beyond Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa. They remind us of Thomas Alva Edison’s famous admonition that “if we all did the things we are capable of doing, we would literally astound ourselves.” These individuals remind us of the wellspring of human potentiality that lies within each and all of us.

Bono, lead singer and lyricist for the Irish rock band U-2, was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II for his global activism on behalf of the poor of Africa via nonprofit organizations he co-founded (DATA, EDUN, One Campaign, and Product Red), global campaigns and benefit concerts he co-hosted, and personal diplomacy he initiated with world leaders on behalf of third-world debt relief. Mutombo, the Houston Rockets NBA defensive star, donated $15,000,000 toward the opening of a $29,000,000 300-bed hospital in his hometown of Kinshasa, Congo named after his mother who had not received adequate health care a few years earlier. Paul Newman co-founded Newman’s Own, a food company from which Newman donated all post-tax profits to charity. As of November 2008, over $250,000,000 had been donated to charities selected by the Newman family.

Bono, Mutombo, and Newman all remind us of the possibilities among our species for transcendence of self. As John W. Gardner, himself an amazing transcendent leader, reminded us:

“The reservoir of unused human talent is vast and learning to tap that reservoir more effectively is one of the exciting tasks ahead for mankind … we can do better … much, much better … The development of leaders is possible on a scale far beyond anything we have ever attempted.” (1990, p. xv)

Each of us, in our own ways, can aspire to transcendent leadership, making differences with our lives toward increased global sustainability.

Warren Buffett, CEO and Chairman of the Board, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.;
Bill Gates, Sr / Bill and Melinda Gates, Founders, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

On March 5, 2009, Bill Gates, Sr. was asked to introduce his son, Bill Gates, founder and former CEO of Microsoft and head of The Bill and  Melinda Gates Foundation, to a large audience gathered to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Seattle Rotary Club. Bill Gates, Sr. noted that an introduction required the use of “e-s-t” at the end of some word and that it should never be an exaggeration. After eliminating the use of “youngest,” “brightest,” and “richest” as no longer accurate…he settled on “the largest philanthropist in the history of the world.” Indeed, that powerful truth described his son, the man behind the emergence of the most well-endowed and ambitious nonprofit effort in the history of the world.

It also represented the largest transfer of wealth from Warren Buffett, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., to The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, resulting in the largest nonprofit organization in the history of the world. Buffett’s ability to transcend self for the cause of the best possible investment in the nonprofit world modeled selfless giving for all of humanity.

All four of these individuals, Bill Gates, Sr., who served as founding chair of the foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates, who invested many billions of their wealth to growing its corpus – and who now retired early from Microsoft to lead their foundation, and Warren Buffett, who invested in a cause that would make his legacy larger, all working together —modeled transcendent leadership on the path for global sustainability.

All four of these transcendent leaders modeled the unlimited possibilities of people working together to solve complex human problems in a world grown smaller by an information infrastructure that makes everyone, everywhere now part of one global family with its attendant roles and responsibilities of an emergent humanity. The Gates family and Warren Buffett modeled the humility, courage, and vision of transcendent leadership and the resulting effectiveness of humanitarian work as measured by the metrics of global health care and sustainability.

• Bill Drayton, Founder and CEO, Ashoka: Innovators for the Public and Global Fellowship of Social Entrepreneurs;
• Muhammad Yunus, Founder, Bangladesh’s Grameen Bank

Bill Drayton, assistant administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), resigned shortly after the election of President Ronald Reagan. Then 35 years old, he founded Save the EPA and set sail following his dream of creating a global nonprofit organization that would identify, support, and celebrate the world’s leading social entrepreneurs. Ashoka today operates in over 50 countries around the world providing over 1,500 social entrepreneurs with over $40 million in direct funding and celebrating them as Ashoka Fellows, lending credibility to their efforts and sharing their patterns for producing major, positive social change with the rest of the world’s people.

For the last twenty years, Ashoka has traced the emergence of social entrepreneurship worldwide. Its 120 staff members have gathered thousands of nominators worldwide to search for people who are creating great positive change and can thus serve others as global social change models.

In the words of David Bornstein, “The selection process for Ashoka Fellows began with what Drayton called the ‘knockout test’: Does the candidate have a new and potentially pattern-setting idea?” (p. 118).

“Consider Muhammad Yunus, who also played a leading role in crafting and spreading the idea of micro-credit as a strategy to overcome poverty. Micro-credit has, of course, been around in various forms for centuries. But Yunus was the one who challenged banking theory by showing how to systemically extend collateral-free loans on a cost-effective basis to poor villagers at a scale that seized the world’s attention. The Grameen Bank has 2.8 million borrowers scattered in 42,000 villages. Imagine the job of delivering and recovering all these loans. How could such a system work? How would it stay honest? Yunus came up with dozens of “how tos.” (p. 20)

Bill Drayton set out to change the world. He set out to map the world’s most successful entrepreneurs in the social sector. Ashoka, now funded by a large grant from The Omidyar Foundation, continues to connect the world’s successful social entrepreneurs with people choosing to make differences in their own communities around the world. In the process, it is also helping to define the complex metrics for measuring success in the emergent global social sector.

Jane Goodall, Founder, Jane Goodall Institute/  Roots & Shoots

Jane Goodall is celebrated for her decades-long study of chimpanzees in Gombe Stream National Park, Tanzania, for her creation of the Jane Goodall Institute promoting the improvement of the environment for all living things, and for her creation of Roots & Shoots connecting youth of all ages worldwide with a desire to help create a more sustainable world.

Guided by the founding principles and extraordinary vision of Jane Goodall, the Roots & Shoots network encourages tens of thousands of young people in almost 100 countries to make a difference with their lives, to change the world for the better.

In the words of Jane Goodall:

“Roots creep underground everywhere and make a firm foundation. Shoots seem very weak, but to reach the light, they can break open brick walls. Imagine that the brick walls are all the problems we have inflicted on our planet. Hundreds of thousands of roots & shoots, hundreds of thousands of young people around the world, can break through these walls. We CAN change the world.” (http://www.Rootsandshoots.org/aboutus/).

Jane Goodall’s hopefulness about our youth, about our roots & shoots, lies at the core of transcendent leadership and at the heart of the actions required by our future global citizens to move our planet onto a path of global sustainability.

James P. Grant, Executive Director, UNICEF

James P. Grant, as head of UNICEF, led a child survival revolution “that saved the lives of at least 25 million children. From 1980 until his death in 1995, Grant, as head of Unicef, conceived and led a worldwide campaign to make simple, low-cost health solutions available to children everywhere…as a result, the worldwide vaccination rate for children increased from 20 to 80 percent” (Bornstein, p. 242). James Grant shows us the power of one person, one transcendent leader, to change the world.

James Grant organized the first World Summit for Children in 1990. The summit held in New York City brought together over 70 heads of state to establish goals and objectives for children’s health worldwide. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, initiated by Grant, a Magna Carta for children, became international law in 1990. It was not signed by the United States, however, until 1995, when James Grant appealed to then President Bill Clinton to sign the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. At his memorial service, held at the Church of St. John of the Divine in New York City, President Clinton instructed U.S. Ambassador Madeleine Albright to sign the treaty. Said Albright, “Nobody fought harder for this convention and its noble cause than Jim Grant. That was the last thing he spoke to me about before his death.” Such was the clear focus of this transcendent leader who saved more children’s lives in the world than any other human being.

Grant demonstrated the power of the United Nations to do good in the world. His work inspired the creation of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) to revitalize immunization programs for children worldwide.  More recently, long after his death, his work inspired Rotary International and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to reduce the cases of polio in the world by 99% – promising a day when polio, like smallpox earlier, would be eradicated. He modeled the power of one transcendent leader bringing the world sustainable, simple solutions to complex human problems. Addressing the downward spiral of poverty, population, and environmental degradation, James Grant improved the lives of the world’s least advantaged – the children of the developing world. Working together with global leaders, Grant modeled the unlimited possibilities of creative, low-cost responses to complex human problems of global sustainability.

Ryuzaburo Kaku, Chairman of Canon, Inc.

R. Kaku, who later became Chairman of Canon, Inc., was in 1945 an eighteen year old working on a large ship when the bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. Although he was a junior member of the crew, Kaku led his fellow crew members deep within the hold of the ship convincing them of the danger of radiation. When he emerged from the ship with the crew in three days, he was no longer the same person. Kaku emerged a transcendent leader focused passionately on helping to create a more sane world (Jaworski, p. 171).

As Chairman of Canon, Inc., Kaku was a citizen of the world. He outlined the role that corporations should play in an increasingly interdependent world. Kaku promoted a principle of “kyosei” – of living together in harmony and interdependence with the other peoples of Earth. The “spirit of Canon” was focused on customers, employees, and global society. Kaku promoted a vision of fourth stage companies committed to serving humankind as a whole through words and actions.

“At its fiftieth anniversary, Canon made the decision to become the fourth kind of company. ‘Its responsibility is to address the larger conflicts in the world…the growing imbalance between the rich and the poor…to set up manufacturing operations in developing countries, to transfer technology, and to help them to become self-sufficient.’ The other global imbalance, which Kaku said was just as critical, is the depletion of the world’s natural resources and the destruction of the environment.” (Jaworski, p.167)

“I am convinced,” Kaku said, “that if companies all over the world would join us  in this quest, the world would be a vastly better place” (p. 167). Kaku, a transcendent leader committed to global sustainability, is today continuing to challenge corporate leaders in retirement via public speaking and publications. His article on the path of kyosei in the July 1997 issue of Harvard Business Review issued the global call for collaborative work toward global sustainability.

Wendy Kopp, Founder & CEO, Teach for America

Wendy Kopp proposed the creation of Teach for America in her 1988 senior year thesis at Princeton University. She believed that many of her generation would choose making a difference over making more money; that they would choose teaching over more money-making ventures if a prominent teacher corps existed. The amazing history and development of that organization is described by Kopp in her book, One day, all children: The unlikely triumph of Teach for America and what I learned along the way.

Operating in over 30 regions of the United States today with 3,700 incoming teaching corps members and an operating budget of over $75 million, Teach for America is the elite teacher corps that Wendy Kopp had envisioned. Its foundation now supports similar initiatives worldwide by local entrepreneurs wishing to serve the poor in their counties around the world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy.Kopp).

Jean Monnet,  President, ECSC High Authority, Founder, Action Committee of the United States of Europe, Architect of the reunification of Europe

In Howard Gardner’s Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership, the author saves the last historical reviews for the book’s two great transcendent leaders: Mahatma Gandhi and Jean Monnet, two people who clearly modeled leadership beyond national boundaries. While Gandhi focused on improving direct relationships with people around the world, Monnet focused on creating international governmental forms. Both men were transcendent in that “their methods were their message” (p. 278). Yet, their approaches were different.

“Monnet was the invisible man, the embodiment of impersonality, who spent time thinking carefully about how to achieve his ends. He built up a small group of trusted associates and made great demands on them as well as on himself; for the most part, Monnet and his team operated in privacy … Indeed, Monnet made a point of avoiding credit, feeling that such notoriety would ultimately undermine his own ability to get things done.” (p. 278)

Monnet was always singularly focused on his identity story of Europe becoming one society with close ties to the United States. By the time John F. Kennedy awarded Jean Monnet the Freedom Prize, the European Common Market and European Union had become realities. President Kennedy said:

“For centuries, emperors, kings, and dictators have sought to impose unity on Europe by force. For better or worse, they have failed. But under your inspiration, Europe has moved closer to unity in less than twenty years than it had in over a thousand. You and your associates have built with the mortar of reason and the brick of economic and political interest. You have transformed Europe by the power of a constructive idea.” (Gardner, 1995, p. 271)

While Gandhi’s transcendence was focused on the power of truth (satyahgraha) and the modeling of global village (ashram), Monnet modeled the power of a transcendent idea and the power of persistent effort. Least he be misunderstood in years to come, Monnet stated clearly in the closing pages of his memoirs that he hoped to be remembered not as the creator of a united Europe … but as one who helped with the first steps toward a united world – a transcendent and visionary leader to the end.

Pierre and Pam Omidyar, CEO and Founders, eBay and The Omidyar Foundation/ Omidyar Network

Pierre Morad Omidyar was born in Paris, France, to Iranian parents. At age six, Omidyar moved to the United States with his family. On a long holiday weekend, twenty-two years later, Pierre Omidyar wrote the computer code for what would become the auction site eBay. Like many immigrants before him, Omidyar brought his genius to his new homeland…a gift that brought new enterprise to America and challenged Omidyar to give back more to the world.

Later, Pierre Omidyar, eBay founder, and his wife, Pam, founded The Omidyar Foundation to support nonprofit enterprises based on the firm conviction that every person has the power to make a difference. They next founded the Omidyar Network to expand their efforts to make a difference beyond nonprofit organizations to for-profit organizations and public policy groups. All efforts focused on harnessing the power of markets to create opportunities for people to improve their lives and thus make lasting contributions to their communities. eBay had been built by Pierre Omidyar around three company core values:

• People are basically good.
• Everyone has something to contribute.
• An open environment brings out the best in people.

The successes of eBay and of the Omidyar Foundation and Network underscored the power and truth of these core values in the real world (http://news.ebay.com/history.cfm).

James D. Sinegal,  Founder & CEO, COSTCO Wholesale

James Sinegal represents a new model of transformational leadership for corporate America – one that truly emphasizes people and profits, one that expands people beyond shareholders to include employees and customers. COSTCO Wholesale has singlehandedly challenged the corporate model of focusing on shareholder and short term profit at the expense of long term growth and community.

Jim Sinegal’s low CEO salary, relative to other comparable corporation CEOs, modeled fair compensation unlike most his fellow corporate heads whose sky-high salaries and golden parachutes made a mockery of fair play and featured trustees who served no one but themselves and their CEO.

“Perhaps most unusual, Sinegal has resisted Wall Street pressure to become a less generous employer; store workers earn an average of $17 an hour and pay just 9% of the cost of health insurance, a rich package in the penny-pinching retail industry. ‘our attitude is that if you hire good people and pay them a fair wage, then good things will happen for the company,’ says Sinegal, who remains hale at 70. Costco’s success proves that low prices for consumers don’t have to come at the expense of wages and benefits for others.” (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1186981,00.html)

Concluded Jim Sinegal about his transformational leadership style, “Our code of ethics says we have to obey the law. We have to take care of our customers, take care of our people. And if we do those things, we think that we’ll reward our shareholders.” (http://abcnews.go.com/2020/business/story?id=1362779).

Between work for COSTCO and the efforts of the COSTCO Foundation to help children’s hospitals across the country, Jim Sinegal models an alternative paradigm of corporate leadership, one more aligned with an emergent transcendent leadership – and one helping to light the path toward global sustainability. Promoting a culture of trust by being trust-worthy himself, Jim Sinegal models Greenleaf’s servant leader to a generation of American corporate leaders.

Jerry and Anita Zucker, Governors and CEOs, Hudson’s Bay Company and the InterTech Group/The Zucker Family Foundation

Jerry Zucker was born in Tel Aviv, Israel in 1949 and immigrated to the United States with his parents and brother three years later. Like Omidyar, Zucker became a self-made billionaire through his genius and enterprise. Over 350 inventions and patents bear his name including his first invention developed in high school which was used in America’s first lunar landing module.

Like Omidyar, Jerry Zucker contributed much to his new homeland. He was an American original with the genius of Thomas Alva Edison and the business acumen of Warren Buffett. In a short lifetime, my brother, Jerry, modeled transcendent leadership as founder and CEO of the InterTech Group, a global conglomerate, and as the first American Governor and CEO of Hudson’s Bay Company, the oldest commercial corporation in North America. Created as a fur-trading venture under a royal charter in 1670, Hudson’s Bay Company was renewed as Canada’s largest retailer by Jerry Zucker. He brought pride back to Canada’s national treasure as well as profitability. At the same time, he grew The InterTech Group into one of America’s largest privately held companies.

Jerry was a humble and brilliant man…and, as a result, many of his good works were done under the radar of public visibility. Beyond the many beneficiaries of his family foundation,  Jerry quietly helped to finance international missions that provided medical supplies to people around the world and that moved many peoples out of harm’s way. He also served in leadership positions for many organizations ranging from the Boy Scouts to the South Carolina Aquarium. During his last months of life, dying from brain cancer, Jerry was obsessed with the work not yet done. His primary thought was that evil came from good people doing nothing. And that there was much to be done globally to combat the darkness. At his eulogy, as Jerry’s three year older brother, I charged those assembled: “Jerry never quit the good fight, and now that good fight is ours.”

Upon his death, Anita, Jerry’s wife of many years, became the first woman Governor and CEO in Hudson’s Bay 338-year history. Anita also took over as Chair and CEO of the InterTech Group while oldest son, Jonathan, was named president. Using a transcendent theme of Tikkun Olam (the repair of the world), the renewed corporation of the InterTech Group promised to live up to the legacy of its founder, Jerry Zucker. Anita took over where Jerry left off. Under the leadership of Anita Zucker, the company has already undergone a transformation that will help its people fight the good fight globally.

Core values: strengths and limitations

A belief in the innate goodness of people and their unlimited potential for doing good empowered the visions of many of these transcendent leaders. They clearly believed in the power of people working together for noble causes. They also exuded hope in themselves and in others and in their enterprise, enough hope and confidence necessary to accomplish great good.

Most of these transcendent leaders modeled great humility putting their corporate goals ahead of their own egos. Most avoided the  spotlight, rather they encouraged others to take the credit and  thus motivated others to higher levels of giving to worthy causes.

Most of these transcendent leaders modeled persistence in the cause of their great ideals, persistence to go the distance to seeing their visions become reality. Most also had the courage to act on their truths with passion and conviction.

Humility, persistence, and courage can lead to great success in the work of the social sector. A belief in the goodness of people encourages trust.

Nevertheless, not all people are trustworthy and evil does exist in the world. Limitations of these core values and beliefs include a willingness to overlook the untrustworthy and the evil in order to focus on good works. This limitation can lead to naïve decision making and overly optimistic projections of social change. It can lead to overemphasizing the good in human nature and thus not assessing current reality with balance. It can also lead to trusting people  who are not trustworthy and thus putting the entire enterprise at risk.

After all, evil does exist in the world or humanity would not be in its current state of global crisis economically, socially, environmentally and untrustworthy leaders would not abound. Therein lies our responsibility as global citizens to remove those leaders who do not serve the common good. In the words of Robert K. Greenleaf,

“A new moral principle is emerging which holds that the only authority deserving one’s allegiance is that which is freely and knowingly granted by the led to the leader in response to and in proportion to, the clearly evident servant nature of the leader.” (1974, pp. 3-4)

A leader and/or leadership circle must be deemed trustworthy or else he/she/they must be removed from office. Leadership, in order to become transcendent, will have to be transactional in changing an evil order into one serving the common good. As these powerful life stories convince us, the limitations might well be worth the risk. For if we assume the best of people, they might rise to our expectations of them. If we treat people as if they were trustworthy, they might rise to our higher expectations of them.

Transcendent leadership and global sustainability: Purpose, relationship, and renewal

Both transcendent leadership and global sustainability embrace three essential organizational emphases: 1) purpose, 2) relationship, and 3) renewal.

Purpose aligns the organizational mission in core values where talk and walk are one. Purpose integrates personal talents and passions with larger organizational goals and objectives. A compelling purpose draws people toward a desired future, whether personal or corporate.  Both transcendent leadership and global sustainability embody passionate purpose and focused involvement in pursuit of collaborative enterprise.

Relationship is about service to others.  Service above self is key to accessing both transcendence and sustainability. The power of caring and the energy of compassion are manifested through the vehicle of service to others. Both global sustainability and transcendent leadership are empowered by deep senses of connection and community. Service above self finds a nutrient seedbed in the work of transcendence and of global sustainability.

Renewal is about sustainability and transcendence. It is about connecting to the wholeness that surrounds us through reflection, nature, meditation, prayer, intuition, and community building – renewal activities that lead to increased personal satisfaction and organizational synergy. Renewal is key to the success of work in transcendent leadership and in global sustainability.

Yes, transcendent leadership and global sustainability are deeply related and both will serve as tools for the transformation ahead which will offer a pathway to global consciousness and to a world that works in our best interests as global citizens.

In the words of Arnold Toynbee, “The twentieth century will be chiefly remembered in future centuries not as an age of political conflicts or technical inventions, but as an age in which human society dared to think of the welfare of the whole human race as a practical objective” (Bornstein, 2004, p.242).  Perhaps, Toynbee’s forecast was premature but it will surely be achieved, if we are to survive as a species, in the twenty-first century.

“Leadership to cross over must come from us all, and, in every sector, people are stepping forward to make a difference” (Link, Corral, & Gerzon, 2006, p. 299). Each of us must be born anew to fully embrace transcendent leadership and global sustainability. Each of us must reunite with Earth to act on “the welfare of the whole human race as a practical objective.” It can and it will be done.

References

Aldon, L.J. (2004). Transcendent leadership and the evolution of consciousness. London: Lightening Source UK Ltd.

Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

Cherrey, C., Gardiner, J.J. , &  Huber, N. (Eds.) (2003). Building Leadership Bridges. 2003. College Park, Maryland: International Leadership Association & Center for Creative Leadership.

Crossan, M. & Mazutis, D. (2008). Transcendent leadership. Business Horizons, 51, 131-139.

Crossan, M., Vera, D., & Nanjad, L. (2008). Transcendent leadership: Strategic leadership in dynamic environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 5, 569-581.

De Boer, H. (2002). Trust, the essence of governance? In A. Amaral, G.A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.) Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. New York: Springer.

Erikson, E.H. (1969).Gandhi’s truth: On the origins of militant nonviolence. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Friedman, T.L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

Gardiner, J. J. (1988). Building leadership teams. In M. F. Green (Ed.),Leaders for a new era: Strategies for higher education (137-153). New York: American Council on Education/ Macmillan Publishing Company.

Gardiner, J.J. (2006). Building leadership teams: A comprehensive study of America’s college and university presidents, 1988-2003. Kravis Leadership Institute. Leadership Review, 6, fall 2006, 131-143.

Gardiner, J.J.Z. (2008). Global leadership in Rotary: Survey of the top 1% district governors (1997-2005) regarding structures and strategies to achieve exceptional performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Leadership Association, Los Angeles, CA, USA, November 13, 2008.

Gardiner, J.J. (2001). Growing leadership circles for Rotary’s emergent future. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Leadership Association, Miami, Florida, November 3, 2001.

Gardiner, J.J. (2002). Sovereign to steward: Emergent roles and responsibilities of Rotary International’s new district governor. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Leadership Association, Seattle, Washington, November 16, 2002.

Gardiner, J.J. (2006). Transactional, transformational, and transcendent leadership: Metaphors mapping the evolution of the theory and practice of governance. Kravis Leadership Institute. Leadership Review, 6, spring 2006, 62-76.

Gardiner, J.J.Z. (2008). Transcendent leadership: Pathway to more effective and ethical board governance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Leadership Association, Los Angeles, CA, USA, November 14, 2008.

Gardiner, J.J.Z. & Walker, E.L. (2009). Transcendent leadership: Theory and practice of an emergent metaphor. International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 5, In Press.

Gardner, H. (1995). Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Gardner, J.W. (1990). On leadership. New York: The Free Press.

Gardner, J.W. (1963). Self-renewal: The individual and the innovative society.  New York: Harper & Row.

Green, M.F. (Ed.). (1988). Leaders for a new era: Strategies for higher education. New York: American Council on Education/ Macmillan Publishing Company.

Greenleaf, R.K. (1974). Trustees as servants. Newton Centre: MA: The Robert K. Greenleaf Center.

Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist Press.

Greenspan, A. (2007). The age of turbulence: Adventures in a new world. New York: The Penguin Press.

Hak, T. (2007). Frameworks for policy integration indicators, for sustainable development, and for evaluating complex scientific evidence. EEA

GEAR-SD framework cited in Sustainability indicators, SCOPE 67. London: Island Press.

Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L.H. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. London: Earthscan.

Hesburgh, T.M. Where are college presidents’ voices on important public Issues? The Chronicle on Higher Education, February 2, 2001, B20.

Hock, D. (1999). Birth of the chaordic age. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Jaworski, J. (1996). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Kaku, R. (1997). The path of kyosei. Harvard Business Review, July 1997.

Kelly, K. W. (1988). The home planet.  Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Kopp, W. (2001). One day, all children: The unlikely triumph of Teach for America and what I learned along the way.

Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, B. (1993). Credibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Larkin, D. (1995). Beyond self to compassionate healer: Transcendent leadership. (Doctoral dissertation, Seattle University).

Link, W., Corral, T., & Gerzon, M. (2006). Leadership is global: Co-creating a more humane and sustainable world. Tokyo: Shinnyo-en Foundation.

Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). The connective edge: Leading in an interdependent world. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

McIntyre, R. W. (1999). Trans-domain leadership: Implications for the 21st century – A case study of the non-traditional, transformational leadership of John Henry Stanford, 1961-1998. (Doctoral dissertation, Seattle University).

Monnet, J. (1978). Memoirs. Translated by R. Mayne. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

Norton, B. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Payton, R.L. (1997). Presidents as public teachers. Educational Record, 78, (1), 55-59.

Pilgrim, P. (1983). Peace Pilgrim: Her life and work in her own words. Sante Fe, N.M.: An Ocean Tree Book.

Pollack, A. (1999). 90th birthday interview with Peter F. Drucker. The New York Times, November 14, 1999, p. B2.

Pope John XXIII. (1964). Journey of a soul. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Tipgos, M.A. & Keefe, T.J. (2004). A comprehensive structure of corporate governance in post-Enron corporate America. The CPA Journal, a publication of the New York State Society of CPAs, December, 2004.

Useem, M. (2007). The World Economic Forum: A call to exercise global leadership, not simply self interest. Wharton Leadership Digest, 11(5), February 2007, 1-2.

Wilbur, K. (1980). The Atman Project. Wheaton, IL: The Theosophical Publishing House.

Wilbur, K. (2000). A theory of everything. Boston. MA: Shambhala Publications.

Winfrey, O. (2005). What I know for sure. New York: O, The Oprah Magazine, Inc.

Zacko-Smith, J.D. (2007). The leader label: Influencing perceptions, reality, and practice. Kravis Leadership Institute. Leadership Review, 7, summer 2007, 75-88.

About the Author

John Jacob Zucker Gardiner is a professor of leadership at Seattle University. John served on the Board of the International Leadership Association (ILA) and on the Board of its founding association, the Center for the Advanced Study of Leadership at the University of Maryland- College Park. John chaired ILA’s 2002 Global Conference. Gardiner currently serves on the Advisory Board of Leadership Review. John’s research focuses on leadership, governance, renewal, and emerging organizational forms.